On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 07:54:23PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > BTW, nsec is completely bogus. There isn't an OS that I know of that
> > reports nsec intervals. Windows comes the closest with 100 nsec chunks,
>
> On *BSD platforms, stat() returns nanoseconds in a timespec struct
> or in the st_?timensec variable for the {amc}time values. Therefore,
> it is conceivable to have nsec support in apr_time_t to represent
> file times efficently (if the underlying OS supports it).
>
> So, I don't believe nsec support is as far-fetched as it first
> sounds. -- justin
So that is 4 platforms out of how many? I am saying 4, because that is
NetBSD, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, and Mac OS X. We have never tried to implement
features that weren't available on most platforms before.
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
550 Jean St
Oakland CA 94610
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
