> >I would not support this change, simply because I don't see it making a > >huge difference. We are better off fixing the apr_time_t implementation > >and then looking for things like this. > > > > I agree. Once we go to the binary microsecond implementation, > what we'll be able to do within poll is: > - extract the microseconds with a bitwise AND (encapsulated within > apr_time_usec()) > - cast to 32 bits if the macro doesn't do so automatically > - then do a 32-bit division by 1000 to get milliseconds (which > is a lot cheaper than the current 64-bit division on 32-bit > platforms)
Or make apr_interval_time a 32-bit value to begin with. :-) Rya _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Jean St Oakland CA 94610 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------