Branko Äibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway, the intent here is to tell the user what the APR > _implementation_ knows about the path encoding. On most platforms, APR > doesn't do anything with the paths, so we know that information can be > pulled from the locale. On Windows, we know when we'll return UTF-8, > regardless of locale. The enum would only grow if we started doing > something radically different in a port to a new system. > > We need opinions from lots of Unix people here. Folks, don't be shy! :-)
:-) +1, and I think I prefer the simplicity of Brane's original implementation. In fact, I wonder if we couldn't do it *entirely* with macros, since the function call just compiles down to a single return statement anyway. Why not avoid the function call overhead entirely? -K
