On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:34:39PM -0700, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > I agree with your sentiment, and frankly, I don't care whether we use > apr_socket_t or not, as long as I can use the same functions to read and > write to AF_UNIX and AF_INET sockets, because that's what I really need to > do... :)
I don't see how we can do that unless you use apr_send/apr_sendv, which both take apr_socket_t. Since there are implementations of the bsd-style sockets on Windows that support AF_UNIX/AF_LOCAL, I don't see why we don't just merge that into our current apr_socket.h implementation. -aaron
