* Greg Stein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:19:38AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:10:18AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote: > > > i'm seeing bits-n-pieces of what the current "proper" way of compiling > > > and > > > linking an apr based program is. would be very helpful to see the > > > complete steps given the simple program below. or is it already > > > documented somewhere? > > > > You need to use apu-config. -- justin > > To clarify: you *also* need to use apu-config. > > apr-config for the APR lib and its dependents. > apu-config for the APRUTIL lib and its dependents (except for libapr) > > > I'm not sure we have a solid rationale for excluding APR. It would certainly > avoid lib duplication, say if apr-iconv and apr-util and apr-FOO all brought > in libapr references. > Agreed. It would also be a lot more rational - if you want to use apr, use apr-config, if you want apr-util, use apu-config only. -T
-- Thom May -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <buxy> asuffield: my english is not so bas as you may think ;-)
