<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW, I want to be 100% clear. We don't use incomplete types for binary > compatibility. The only reason that we use incomplete types is for > portability reasons. In APR 2.0, I fully expect most of the incomplete > types to shrink, and for a good portion of APR to use complete types.
I want to be 100% clear too :) One reason we use incomplete types is for binary compatibility. Maybe there was a time when we didn't care about that, but those days are over. -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
