At 04:56 PM 11/24/2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>We have a problem with APR and APR-util commit messages. The problem is >>that if you commit code from the top of the httpd-2.0 tree, the commit >>message goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not [EMAIL PROTECTED] This means >>that anybody who does not receive httpd commit messages is missing a LARGE >>number of apr and apr-util commits. That is a bad thing. > >So don't do that. Commit the code per tree along with the CHANGES per tree >and there won't be any problem. In general, doing a blind commit from the >top level without first checking what will be committed is a bad idea.
I completely concur. Also, httpd or other cvs users who are using non-apr tags can be really messed up with a simple cvs up -r FOO. Perhaps the simplest thing for httpd users is to modify srclib/CVS/Entries and remove the D/apr[-util/-iconv]//// lines. This prohibits CVS from drilling down into those directories from httpd or other project's commits. Bill
