Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Anyway, I've had enough of this as well. Sorry to the subversion guys but I > > tried... > > I honestly thing that if the Subversion guys make their 'Temp' directory > configurable on application level (and document the use semantics: volume, > xs-permission, mostly read, mostly write, NO socket/shar-mem files or > other aspects) that their application will only benefit from an operations > perspective - and that ultimately they have made a better application than > when they would defer to the bowels of APR to make a guess as what 'temp' > means for them.
Wow... so our 'svnlook' utility needs to grow config file support or some unwieldy --with-tmp cmdline argument just because the portability layer doesn't want to answer a single portability question. Interesting...
