I'm sorry... this patch dir not come through to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for me today (although I watched for it...) but it's simply WRONG.
At 07:04 PM 12/17/2002, =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= wrote: >>--- apr/file_io/unix/dir.c 15 Dec 2002 05:17:51 -0000 1.69 >>+++ apr/file_io/unix/dir.c 17 Dec 2002 00:49:35 -0000 >>@@ -218,10 +218,10 @@ >> return ret; >> } >> >>-#ifdef DIRENT_INODE >>+#ifndef DIRENT_INODE >> wanted &= ~APR_FINFO_INODE; >> #endif Old logic; if we have an INODE from dirent, we don't care that we want an INODE from stat() because we already have the INODE. New Logic: if we don't have an INODE, we won't ask for an INODE from stat(). I'm sorry, but that's just broken. ' Please revert and (re)post the original description of the problem. If you pass APR_FINFO_TYPE | APR_FINFO_INDOE | APR_FINFO_NAME that is *ALL* you are promised... we do NOT stat for info you don't ask for. Bill
