Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --On Thursday, January 9, 2003 11:17 AM -0500 Jeff Trawick > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > yuck... > > > > move Sander's tag back or back out the change to APR until the > > window just prior to 1.0? > > As has been pointed out, APR 1.0 must maintain backwards-compatibility > with what we're using right now for httpd. In essence, we already > froze the APR API the second httpd-2.0 branched off since httpd > guaranteed binary compatibility forever (which includes APR). Perhaps > we should start considering moving to APR 2.0 *very* soon.
Silly me. I thought that Apache 2.0 would use APR 0.9.x and Apache >= 2.1 would switch to APR 1.0. -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
