Cliff Woolley wrote: >On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, [UTF-8] Branko Äibej wrote: > > > >>Excuse me? your compiler is broken. A function definition is a >>prototype, so you don't need an extra prototype in this case. But I >>agree that the prototypse should live in a better place. >> >> > >gcc -Wstrict-prototypes causes this. We look for these on purpose. :) > >
Oh, I'm not saying it's good style, only that it's valid C. :-) I'll move those protos to apr_private.h now. -- Brane Äibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
