Yes... I know I already responded, now new questions; At 04:53 PM 3/5/2003, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >if it is possible FD_CLOEXEC should really be independed of >inherit_(un)set. It should be applied to every fd opened by default >(if available) apart from 012 which seem to already be handled their >own way. One may have a flag (perhaps also use APR_FILE_NOCLEANUP) to >supress usage.
As I suggested, CLOEXEC isn't independent. It is the way *some* platforms would prefer to implement inherit_[un]set. Not all, such as TPF, but the vast majority would have an easier time with it. >Why ? Because we had seen wrong usage of APR_IMPLEMENT_(UN)INHERIT_SET >epanded macros at various files in the apache httpd code... I'm guessing you do not mean wrong usage of the macro APR_IMPLEMENT_(UN)INHERIT_SET, but rather inaccurate calls (missing when useful or present when invalid). In either case your citations would be helpful to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list so they can start fixing those bugs. Bill
