> From: Ben Laurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 8:58 PM
[...]
> ISTR Ben Hyde ranting to me about how this isn't strictly true... in
> particular, if you do this:
>
> 1. Register cleanup 1 in pool A
> 2. Make subpool B in A
> 3. Register cleanup 2 in B
> 4. Register cleanup 3 in A
> 5. Register cleanup 4 in B
>
> then destroy A, the order of cleanups is 3,4,2,1.
??
No, the order is 4,2 3,1.
When A gets destroyed the following happens:
A destroys subpools (B)
B gets destroyed
destroys subpools(none)
runs cleanups (4,2)
runs cleanus (3,1)
> It seems to me it would be good to fix this.
It doesn't seem broken to me.
Sander
