William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:29 PM 3/24/2003, Garrett Rooney wrote:
so is 0.9.2 out?
there are tarballs up, but they're labelled 'alpha', and there hasn't been any kind of announcement of a release that i can find. should those of us who maintain packages of it feel free to update them to use the tarballs that are there now, or are those going to be replaced with 'non-alpha' tarballs at some point?
just wondering what the status is.
What say you?
We always wait for a day or two for folks to +1/-1 the image's quality. If we
determine it isn't release quality, the -alpha images stay out there, but won't
be considered a -gold 'release'. Now, since we aren't at 1.0, we really
should just be saying these are -alpha or -beta, but either way, we need
some folks to say +1.
other than the symlink'd install directory issue, which is certainly minor enough to wait for the next release, i haven't found any problems, so i'd say +1, ship it.
-garrett
