--On Saturday, April 5, 2003 2:21 AM -0800 Rohan Nandode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I tried to use APR_LOCK_FCNTL locking method. But it
is also giving same problems. What I observed in FCNTL
locking is,
1. First process while creating a mutex opens a lock
file, gets the fd and stores it for further
operations. Then it unlinks the file.
2. When second process creates mutex, it again creates
a file, stores the fd and deletes it.

Um, they need to share the same APR mutex object. You can't create a mutex in process 1 and another in process 2 and expect it to work. Process 1 and process 2 have to have the same mutex object. Typically, you'd have process 0 create the mutex, then fork process 1 and process 2. This way, the children inherit the correct mutex. You'd need to call apr_proc_mutex_child_init after the fork in each of the children.


APR's process locking semantics don't guarantee they will work on independent processes. -- justin

Reply via email to