At 11:30 PM 7/8/2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >The general suggestion is goodness, but the patch below would >continue to promote ctime ambiguity.
I'm sorry, now I see this isn't the set-mtime-ctime-atime patch, but sets the mtime member discretely. That would be fine for all platforms. Of course we add each supported time stamp per-platform, so win32 gets a crtime_set, and unix an itime_set (or perhaps imtime, e.g. the inode modified time?) Semantics aside, this patch did look like a good idea. Bill
