* Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 6:56 PM > > > I'd like to propose a vote: > > > > [X] - Yes, I think we're ready for 1.0 now (in both apr and apr-util) > > [ ] - No, I think we're not ready for 1.0 because __________ > +1 > > Sidenote, are we tossing all those deprecated APIs before rolling > the 1.0 tarball? (drop the compat wrappers etc.) > I think we should, else we'll be carrying them around for ever. -Thom
- [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Cliff Woolley
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Aaron Bannert
- RE: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Sander Striker
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Thom May
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Brian Pane
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 B. W. Fitzpatrick
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Jeff Trawick
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Jeff Trawick
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Cliff Woolley
- RE: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Sander Striker
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] Time for APR 1.0 Max Bowsher