> From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 2:15 AM
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:22:39PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > Others responded, "lets ditch nested locks". I'm -0.5 on that suggestion. > > Are there reasons we should keep it around? I didn't see any comment > from you for or against the proposal, and frankly I didn't get enough > positive or negative feedback to move ahead. If you intend to remove it, please ensure there is no fallout in the pools debug code. It uses the nested mutexes. Sander
