Cliff Woolley wrote: >On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, [UTF-8] Branko ?^Libej wrote: > > > >>>>Huh, not surprising. apr_atomic.h does _not_ define apr_atomic_init on >>>>Win32, Netware, FreeBSD, Linux, MVS and djgpp; no wonder there are >>>>dangling references to it in apr_pools.obj. >>>> >>>> >>Uh -- I said HEAD, not the 0.9 branch. >> >> > >As a data point, the test builds I ran earlier today where I caught the >missing #include "apr_atomic.h" in apr_pools.c were run on Linux. After >including that, the warning about having no definition of >apr_atomic_init() went away, so it must be getting _something_. > > The linux build (probably) uses atomic/unix/apr_atomic.c. The Windows build doesn't. Since I've been building the static library, this missing reference isn't noticed until the library is actually used in a link.
Anyway, I'll wait until the author of the new atomics API can give me a hint about the genericity of unix/apr_atomic.c. Looks O.K. to me, but I can live on the branch for now and 4 a.m. isn't exactly the best time to start experimenting. -- Brane Äibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
