At 08:41 AM 1/16/2004, Günter Knauf wrote: >Hi, >> What ship? Did 2.1.0 actually go anywhere? Seems from the folks >> complaining that they didn't feel we ever released it. >correct - but I believe Justin meant APR 1.0 and not httpd... >and with APR I've the same feeling than he: >all those doing development fetch from CVS, and therefore they are on APR 1.0 >and httpd-2.1-dev... >so people have already started to rely on 1.0 version; I self patched mod_jk / >mod_jk2 recently to work with APR 1.0, and others did probably with other 3rd >party mods...
Although it is late, a relatively small number of boxes would be affected... ... should we modify the installed library name libapr-1.so to designate that the user is running a dev (non-release) version when using an arbitrary CVS checkout? Something like libapr-dev-1.so? This would prevent production applications from linking against a (potentially) unstable code point. Bill
