Sander Striker wrote: >On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 22:03, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>I couldn't find apr_realloc() in the apr API. Is that on purpose or just >>wasn't needed so far? >> >>I suppose realloc is hard in the pool architecture, since if you have >>allocated something after the alloc, you have to move the already allocated >>memory. >> >> > >apr_prealloc aswell as apr_pfree are doable. I can take a look at >revisiting my earlier patches if there is enough interest. > > apr_prealloc would be nice, I know at least one place in SVN where we could use it, and probably a few places in APR, too. apr_pfree could be useful as a minor optimization instead of creating and destroying a subpool.
-- Brane Äibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
