On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:03:46AM -0500, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:06:14AM +0000, Ben Laurie wrote: > > > Joe Orton wrote: > > > >From delving through C99, this appears to be a valid warning, since the > > > >code has undefined behaviour by section 6.3.2.3 para 8. (which says, to > > > >try and paraphrase: behaviour is undefined if you call a function > > > >through a function pointer where the function and the function pointer > > > >don't have compatible types) > > > > > > Sigh. OK, how do I get hold of C99? > > > > Only by buying a copy from ISO I think. > > However, the N869 draft is free (lots of links to it on google).
Ah, thanks. The paragraph in question is in the same place in that draft, for reference. joe
