Quoting Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:19:25PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Also, this data looks slightly better than it is. While some of the files > are > > in the green block, that doesn't mean that they are fully tested. Often we > test > > a single error condition which gets us coverage, but that block of code > actually > > handles 4 different error cases. If only 1 of 4 is tested, then we are > > reporting full coverage when in reality we are about 25% covered. > > Yeah, gcov -b gives you the branch coverage, it's usually a better > reflection of test coverage.
I considered using gcov -b, but I couldn't figure out a way to bring the data down to a single value. I'll look at this again sometime today to see if I can generate a similar page using -b. Ryan
