Quoting Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > I ended up just committing Nick's patch to testreslist.c. I'm not > > That's a good question. I wasn't at all sure my use of the random > number generation (to simulate a failure rate) would meet APR > portability criteria. In the absence of an apr_random module, > I've a nasty suspicion it should at least be in #ifdef. > Or is srand48/drand48 really portable beyond *X?
Personally, I dislike using a random number to simulate a failure rate. The purpose of the test suite isn't to emulate the real world where you need a failure rate. All you need is one resource that has failed, so that you can test reslist_invalidate. This should be done by forcing a specific resource to fail. When I revamp testreslist.c, I will be making that change as well. Ryan
