* "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 01:36 PM 4/16/2004, Andr� Malo wrote:
> >* Andr� Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Aloa,
> >>
> >> APR should support those POSIX bits on systems where it makes sense.
> >> Attached is a patch for file_io/unix, which seems to used for netware and
> >> OS/2 as well (but seems to be ok in the first glance).
> >>
> >> What do you think about it? If it's cool, I'd like to get it backported
> >to> 0.9 as well so we can use it (also in httpd ;)
>
> I don't see that this would pose any harm to win32.
>
> However how should apr react when asked to create a file or modify the
> perms in such a way that the current platform doesn't expect?
I'd say, it should just ignore them in that case.
nd
--
> [...] wei� jemand zuf�llig, was der Tag DIV ausgeschrieben bedeutet?
DIVerses. Benannt nach all dem unstrukturierten Zeug, was die Leute da
so reinpacken und dann absolut positionieren ...
-- Florian Hartig und Lars Kasper in dciwam
