* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've never seen function pointer types defined that way.
Heh, httpd does it all the time ;-) > The biggest > problem is that this type can't be used without a * in front of the > variable. Not a big deal, but it does make the type less usefull. that's right. but makes it very explicit and protects you from nasty typos. > Also, > the current definition is how all of the existing function pointers are > defined in both APR and APR-util. > Feel free to change it if you want though. Would probably be a compat problem (besides the fact that I don't have apr karma). So let's just leave it as is. nd -- Winnetous Erbe: <http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>
