very well then (I'll change APR_SUCCESS to APR_ENOTIMPL) - is it the same for win32 also ?
-Madhu >-----Original Message----- >From: Brad Nicholes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 3:47 AM >To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/threadproc/netware signals.c > > >In fact it is very likely that they won't be implmented on >NetWare since >we don't have robust signal handling support. > >Brad > >Brad Nicholes >Senior Software Engineer >Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions >http://www.novell.com > >>>> Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thursday, April 22, 2004 2:28:58 AM >>>> >On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:45:38PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >... >> +APR_DECLARE(apr_status_t) apr_signal_block(int signum) >> +{ >> + return APR_SUCCESS; >> +} > >APR_ENOTIMPL is more approriate for stub functions which aren't >implemented on the given platform. > >joe >
