At 08:02 PM 5/21/2004, Stas Bekman wrote: >Before apr 1.0 is cast in stone any chance public enums and defines will get >sensible names? >It all looks nice in the declaration but in the code, one needs to scratch the >head to figure out what APR_REG means. Why not have /^APR_FILETYPE_/ prefix? >APR_FILETYPE_REG requires no head scratching when reading the code and won't >collide with some other enum with a totally different functionality.
+1 >Same goes for defines, for example: >There are all related to files, why pollute the namespace with such short >names and not fix them to have a sensible prefix similar to above suggestion? >/^APR_FILETYPE_/ as in APR_FILETYPE_UREAD. +1 again. This is why 1.0 isn''t ready just yet, IMHO :)
