On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, David Reid wrote: > This has been in bugzilla for a while, and it potentially introduces 2 new > functions to apr-util, hence the vote now.
This is two different things. The new functions are an enhancement, but bug 28450 is serious: a blatent violation of the RFC. Even if people want to ignore enhancements, the minimum patch at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=11268 should certainly go in NOW. > Being 100% honest if people feel that there isn't enough time to review this > then adding these into 1.1 isn't a big deal. That said, Nick did bring this > up quite a while ago and he's already stated he's using a custom apr, so if > people can find the time to review/comment/vote then it'd be good to have > them in 1.0. > > Patch is > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=11270 I've just got CVS commit access to httpd. It is rumoured on IRC that having got that I should be able to "just ask" for APR access. Perhaps someone could confirm or deny this? In any case, if my opinion counts for anything, then +1. -- Nick Kew
