On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:24:31AM +0100, David Reid wrote:
>...
> The proposed change to apr_initialise is presently veto'd by Greg, though
> there are a lot of +1's. I'm still hopeful Greg can explain his veto. That
> said there isn't a patch available yet, so I'm forced to say that this is
> bumped to 1.1, even though it could well be an api change. I'm guessing it
> could (possibly) be done by adding another function, so maybe we can avoid
> the change.
Heh. I had no idea what this was about. Needed to go look it up. Here is
my response/rationale for the veto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apr-dev&m=102928661608249&w=2
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
