At 04:04 PM 6/22/2004, Graham Leggett wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >>I wouldn't mind an rpm spec file for 0.9.6 either. +1 > >There is an outstanding vote in httpd v2.0's STATUS for fixing the spec file >in httpd v2.0.49 (v2.1.0-dev has been fixed). What I'm keen to see though is a >separation of RPM packages, one for apr, one for apr-util, and one for httpd, >depends though on whether httpd v2.0 can build with apr out the tree (I've >never tried).
Progress has been in fits and spurts - but httpd will now build with apr in-tree or out of tree, and as VPATH builds. >Hopefully I'll have a set of spec files ready for APR v1.0.0, and then a set >of spec files ready for httpd v2.0.50. Sounds great :) Bill
