On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 09:28:31AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:34:49PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 08:24:18AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > I'm getting a segfault in testsockets on Solaris 9/Intel. No time to > > > further > > > debug. Is anyone else seeing this? Best I can tell is that an earlier > > > test is failing and it's passing a NULL parameter on. > > > > Does "./testall -v testsockets" give any useful information? > > testsockets : |Line 137: expected <0>, but saw <670008> > \zsh: 13868 segmentation fault ./testall -v testsockets
Oh for an apr_assert_success... the AF_UNSPEC lookup for "::1" gave EAI_NONAME by my calculations which is not unexpected for a build on a Solaris system without IPv6 configured; not a serious failure. > I was curious why testall doesn't abort a sub-test after a failure, but oh > well, I didn't write it... -- justin It did, and now it doesn't, and stuff like this happens a lot now. joe
