William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If Graham's efforts, with Joe's useful feedback, produces a build system
which cleanly lets 0.9 and 1.0 (and future releases) coexist, I'm satisfied we finished APR 1.0.
I've just tried to install an RPM of httpd 2.0.50 onto a system that already has RPMs of apr-1.0.0 and apr-util-1.0.0 installed, and the httpd RPM installs cleanly with no conflicts. The httpd RPM contains httpd + apr-0.9 + apr-util-0.9 rolled up into a single RPM.
A further question though - is it worth making the effort to make RPMs for apr (and apr-util) v0.9, or is it sufficient to leave it as it is now: httpd v2.0.x includes a rolled up version of apr v0.9 in a single package.
In other words, what other projects apart from httpd are using apr v0.9 and not apr v1.0?
Regards, Graham --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
