At 11:05 AM 1/5/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote: >Graham Leggett wrote: >> >> I don't see any hassles about requiring that httpd depend on a certain >> minimum APR (it does already - httpd v2.1 depends minimally on APR v1.0) >> - the only issue is that there has been no official release of apr v1.1 >> yet for httpd to depend on. >> > >Agreed. Let's do apr 1.1
Let's collectively vet apr 1.1 new API changes (now, not a week from now) so we don't have to backtrack and deprecate things later. Remember we are committing to support interfaces upon each release on a minor bump. I'm working on httpd-2.1/apr-1.1 as I comment. Yes, apr-1.1 is about ready, and I agree that multicast can be deferred for apr-1.2. Bill
