On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 08:49:51AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 12:21 PM +0000 Joe Orton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >They say to use the "gnu-libtool" port rather than one of the versioned > >libtool ports, and that the latter are deliberately broken^Wdifferent > >and not for use outside the ports packages. I presume the "gnu-libtool" > >port installs a real "libtoolize" into $PATH. > > No, it doesn't. Fun, isn't it? It installs into /usr/local/gnu-autotools/.
Ha, nice ;) > I think the use of this extra set of ports is silly. I don't see why we > can't use the 'broken' libtool ports: it works suitably fine for me (modulo > Martin's bogus changes that need to be reverted). -- justin Well, after you worked around the fact that it broke --link-libtool, yes... but I guess it will be OK - if I have to spend another afternoon tracking down an errant RPATH=/usr/lib because of this I will come back and haunt you though... ;) joe
