* Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hmm. My thought is that the prefix "svn commit " is redundant and should > >> be dropped. A subject starting with "r126493 - > > > > We always had the 'cvs commit' prefix. I see no compelling reason to > > change this. -- justin > > I do. It becomes much harder to track which changes are of interest > to me when I can't see any meaningful information in the subject line. > It's the same problem as spam: the commits I want to look at are drowned > in those I have no interest in (e.g. recently LDAP - glad to see it > there, but I have nothing to contribute to that work).
I find the prefix is especially useful, when someone replies to such mails to another mailinglist (like this thread). nd
