At 06:19 PM 3/16/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >--On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:05 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL >PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>In answer to the bigger Q - I would discourage anyone from >>adopting apr 1.0 and hope few have. apr 1.0 wasn't ready for >>prime time, to coexist on machines which had our original >>apr 0.9 installed. Now apr 1.1.1 is getting close to getting >>it right. If I voice that we should take things a bit more >>slowly and thoroughly, it's because I expect the same attention >>to detail from apr that folks expect from clib. After all, we >>are asking our users to give that much trust to our library. > >APR 0.9.x and 1.x co-exist just fine on Unix systems. -- justin
0.9 and 1.1 yes. 0.9 and 1.0?
