At 09:57 PM 3/16/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:16:44AM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: >> API_STRINGIFY? When did we grow that? Is this materially different than >> APR_STRINGIFY? > >I know, I know. OtherBill's patches required us to remove any dependencies >upon APR_* functions because the Win32 RC compiler can't handle it. I held my >nose during the commit... -- justin
functions. That's an include. Wasn't required, simply trivial. However it was rather pointless to include apr for a two line #define, don't you think? Apparently not. If you have an issue, rather than grabbing a tissue, try addressing it to the list at that time, as opposed to personal snipes. Once again you sent me hunting for an [annotated] viewsvn history to track down which patch I added that in. Oh wait - svn can't do that. Score another for premature adoption.
