On May 31, 2005, at 11:45 AM, Greg Hudson wrote:
However, we most definitely do need to seek around in FSFS rev files, which are the most common thing to go above 2GB. APR_LARGEFILE won't help us for that case.
Okay, so then there really is a risk here for very large repositories, particularly ones using FSFS.
Should we start recommending that such projects upgrade to APR 1.X (and httpd 2.1, if they're depending on mod_dav_svn?) Should we write a FAQ about it?
Funny, KDE is using fsfs, and I would have expected them to run into a >2GB revision file.
