On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:25:07AM -0700, Wilfredo Sánchez Vega wrote: > I think you're right and that there is some busy-waiting going > on. Though the behavior is legal API-wise, it looks sub-optimal. > Given that, disabling poll until there is a kernel without that > problem seems prudent. I'll go ahead and do that later today and do > that if no one objects.
Thanks for persevering; prudent is good :) joe
