On 6/16/05, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 07:25:55AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > This uses format %pt. (%pT is existing, and results in tid in > > decimal.) The display will use lower-case a-f. > > > > Comments/concerns? > > Seems fine. > > [it would be nice if %pT actually printed the thread id with NPTL rather > than just a pointer value, hmmm]
IOW, look into the opaque value to find something like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc.? That would be nice. OTOH, that would likely break the ability to correlate thread ids among logs/displays which used apr thread id formatting and logs/displays which formatted it directly. Hosed for some uses either way. Use a different format character to try to pretty-print the thread id?
