On Thursday 11 August 2005 03:32, Garrett Rooney wrote: > Also, the testdbd.c program that was recently committed doesn't seem to > actually build...
Hmmm, the original (very perfunctory) test program I wrote is now called test/dbd.c, and appears to want minor updating to deal with not having sight of apr_dbd_driver_t. But I guess that's fairly trivial. I don't know anything about test/testdbd.c. -- Nick Kew
