Joe Orton wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:36:50PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote:
Windows compiles with lots of unnecessary warnings (looks like nobody
ever tests on systems where sizeof(apr_size_t) < sizeof(apr_off_t),
That property is certainly not unique to Windows, what are the warnings?
I posted them in my first response to this thread.
and the tests don't pass:
* testfile::test_bigfprintf fails (Line 697: expected <8194>, but
saw <8192>)
That one at least looks like a genuine bug, though not a regression -
the Unix apr_file_printf() implementation was improved a while back to
cope properly with large strings, but Win32 has a copy of the old code.
Indeed, you're right, STATUS mentions a test_file_info failure which
seems to be gone. The very up-to-date state of STATUS confused me...
-- Brane
