--On August 23, 2005 4:51:52 PM +0100 Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Since 2.6 can enable both TCP_CORK and TCP_NODELAY at the same time, and
TCP_CORK will take precedence, APR can save two syscalls in the critical
path.  Objections?

Looks fine. One question: how does this apply to other OSes which also have TCP_NOPUSH and TCP_NODELAY (such as FreeBSD)?

FWIW, I just couldn't make sense of the way that diff split up the context without applying the patch locally and reading the new function. -- justin

Reply via email to