On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:01:07AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Well... it's pretty clear iconv has no more eyes than three, and half > of those are not project members.
For what it's worth, I've put in the time to review and test each of the proposals you posted, but saw little point in voting. Nevertheless; +1. You can decide what weight to afford it ;) (non-PMC, committer-in-limbo, so I suspect zero) An acknowledged problem with apr-iconv though, is that there's hardly anything to develop. -- Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
