On 10/11/05, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This isn't a vote, but a poll to gauge interest of the community. > > Moving forward into apr 2.x or beyond, which better espresses your > personal interest? > > [ ] Improve (al la apr_prealloc) the pool API, but continue to use > a pool-based schema for apr's resources. > > [ ] Add apr_Xalloc/_Xrealloc/_Xfree based on alternate allocation > strategies, allowing support of non-pool based apr resources.
If pools can be made to allow realloc and free, while still maintaining useful levels of efficiency, I'd say that improving the pool API is enough. If not, I'd like us to look at providing a way to use APR without requiring the use of memory pools. -garrett
