On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 08:49:27AM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: >... > I think that apr-util should continue to be an "everything plus the > kitchen sink" repository for APR-based code which:
+1 > a) the committers of this project think is generally useful, and > b) meets the expected standards of code quality, and > c) is relatively small in magnitude (i.e. I'd be worried about > dumping in tens of thousands of lines of new code) Yup. (c) is why apr-iconv was busted out to a separate project. But IMO, throwing more into apr-util is just fine for now. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
