Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:57:09PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > >>I'd prefer that such an 'example' bundle be distributed separately from >>APR, but it can be referred to in our release notes and on the website.
I'm very much +1 for this, but agree with Justin. > > > Since it's aimed at developers, that shouldn't be any kind of a problem. > The only advantage to in-bundle is that it would get to piggyback on the > httpd source tarballs and get deployed in lots of places were curious > coders might casually come accross it. Of course, this is probably an > inapproriate waste of bytes too. Nah, it's not aimed at the same set of developers. > > >>At first thought, I would probably also prefer that such example code be >>released in the public domain instead of having it under the ALv2 - but >>could be convinced otherwise. (I'd want zero strings attached to this >>example bundle; the ALv2 is essentially unrestricted though...) -- justin > > > This is going to need maintaining, not much, but over time, things will > have to be changed. Not having it live in ASF svn would be a real pain. > Is PD material currently hostable on ASF infrastructure? If it's not we can host it elsewhere, but I don't see why it shouldn't be hostable by the asf. I'd actually like to see us expand the examples so that we have a few that cover some of the advanced features, and maybe apr-util as well. It's one thing that i think is holding back apr a little. david
