Paul Querna wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:Veto - you've broken ABI.What platform is apr_status_t != int?
Sorry... of course. There was a long debate early on about using apr_int32_t or some specific sizing for apr_status_t, and I'd honestly forgotten we went with a simple int, after all :) I see nothing else was modified in the patch, so my veto's inverted, the commit looks fine. Bill
