On Mar 21, 2006, at 1:15 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Feel free to take a guess as to whether your vote will influence mine
in the least. =) -- justin
Oh of course - it's a pretty meager -1, and I didn't plan to bring
it up until
I saw a strong reason for a -1 on apr :) And I'm certainly not
worried about
influencing anyone who don't contribute to the code base - but I am
concerned
about trying to find common ground for the progress of those
developers who
find their code stalled for want of a new release. I am trying to
communicate
what are issues, even if those issues are ignored 8 hours later.
Even when we
disagree, I respect the opinions of all active committers.
I would posit that not having a fix you wish it would have is not
a compelling reason to oppose a release, unless it's a regression
from past releases. Releases shouldn't get progressively worse, but
"not better enough" shouldn't be a blocker for a new release.
Of course I'm tempted to +1 1.2.5, giving darwin the respect it
deserves (in
consideration of the respect that other platforms are given in this
community).
But that would be petty ;-)
On that basis, yes, I suppose it would.
-wsv
